Blogs
What a box of coriander actually costs you to deliver
A box of coriander costs more to deliver than the grower charged for it: add the handling, the pick, a share of the driver's and van's time, a share of every failed delivery, and a share of every credit note issued. Pricing on the buying cost alone routinely loses money on the smallest drops, without anyone noticing.
The number everyone starts from
Say a wholesaler buys a box of coriander for a hypothetical eight pounds, landed at the yard. Cost-plus pricing takes that eight pounds, adds a margin, say twenty per cent, and sells it on for around nine pounds sixty. On paper that looks like a profit on every single box. It is the number a wholesaler can see, because it is on the grower's invoice, and it is also the smallest part of the true cost of getting that box into a kitchen's fridge.
What the invoice leaves out
Between the grower's invoice and the kitchen's fridge sit several more costs, and cost-plus pricing that only adds a margin to the buying price is missing all of them:
- the buying itself, which is the number on the grower's invoice and the only part most pricing actually counts
- receiving and handling the box into stock, checking it against the order and putting it away
- the pick, finding and carrying that specific box for that specific kitchen's order alongside everything else on the van
- a fair share of the driver's time and the van's running cost for that round, whether the drop is one box or twelve
- a share of that week's failed deliveries, spread across every drop that did succeed
- a share of any credit notes issued that week, for a short-dated box, a complaint, or a late arrival
None of those six lines appears anywhere near the grower's invoice, and none of them changes whether the box costs eight pounds or eighty. All of them still have to be paid for by something.
The van does not care how big the order is
A round of, say, twenty drops shares one driver, one vehicle, one morning of fuel and insurance and wear between them - and a drop of one box of coriander carries exactly the same slice of that shared cost as a drop of twelve boxes of everything else, because the van still has to go there, park, and someone still has to walk to the door. A small order is not a small cost to serve. It is often close to the same cost as a large one, spread over far less revenue to absorb it.
A drop of one box carries almost the same delivery cost as a drop of twelve. It just has a twelfth of the revenue to pay for it.
Why the smallest drops are the ones losing money
Put the costs together and the pattern is consistent rather than random: a customer who orders a full pallet every week absorbs the shared delivery cost easily, because it is spread across a large invoice. A customer who orders three items twice a week absorbs the same shared cost against a tiny invoice, and on paper - priced at cost-plus off the buying price alone - that customer often looks exactly as profitable as the pallet order. It is not. A wholesaler who cannot see the delivery, handling and failure cost allocated down to the line cannot see which of his smallest customers he is effectively paying to serve.
None of this is exotic. It is the ordinary cost of running a fleet of vans and a yard, shared correctly, and it is precisely the part that a price built on the grower's invoice plus a flat margin leaves out. One wholesaler running six vans and buying from 27 different traders across the week carries all of it, every day, on every one of the smallest lines in the book. Fixing it is mostly a visibility problem rather than a pricing philosophy problem: put the real shared costs against the actual lines that generated them, at the volume they actually run, and the smallest drops either get repriced properly or get seen clearly enough that keeping them is a deliberate choice rather than an accident nobody noticed.
What it means for how a book gets priced
None of this means every small order should be turned away or repriced overnight - a good customer who has been loyal for years and orders modestly deserves more thought than a spreadsheet formula. What it means is that the decision to keep serving a small, awkward drop at a thin margin should be a decision, made with the real cost in front of whoever is making it, rather than something that happened by accident because the pricing model never had a place to put the delivery cost in the first place.
The same arithmetic works the other way for a wholesaler thinking about growth: a new customer who wants small, frequent drops of awkward, low-value products is a genuinely different proposition from one who wants a full pallet once a week, even if the two invoices look similar in size once a discount is applied. Knowing the difference before agreeing the arrangement, rather than discovering it a year later in the accounts, is the entire point of doing the sum properly in the first place.
Plainly
What it will not do on its own
- It will not tell you to drop a small customer - it shows you the true cost of serving them and leaves the decision exactly where it belongs.
- Failed-delivery and credit-note costs are only as accurate as what gets logged against the round - a driver who does not record a failure keeps that cost invisible.
- It does not set your margin for you. It shows the real cost underneath whatever margin you choose to put on top.
- Catch-weight lines still price on the actual weight picked, never a nominal or averaged figure, which this arithmetic assumes throughout.
Questions people ask
- Why does a small delivery cost almost as much as a large one?
- Because most of the cost of a drop is fixed rather than proportional to the size of the order - the van still has to travel there, park and be walked to the door whether it is delivering one box or twelve, so a small order carries nearly the full delivery cost against far less revenue to pay for it.
- What actually goes into the true cost of delivering a product?
- The buying price is only the start. Add receiving and putting away stock, the pick, a fair share of the driver's and van's time for that round, a share of that week's failed deliveries, and a share of any credit notes issued - all of which sit outside the grower's invoice and rarely get allocated down to an individual product line.
- Is cost-plus pricing wrong for a wholesaler?
- Not wrong, but incomplete if the cost in cost-plus is only the buying price. Adding a margin to what the grower charged, without the delivery, handling and failure cost behind it, routinely makes small or awkward orders look profitable when they are not.
- How can a wholesaler find out which customers are actually unprofitable?
- By allocating the real shared costs - delivery, handling, failed drops and credit notes - down to the individual customer and product line rather than only tracking margin on the buying price, which is the calculation most wholesalers have never had time to run by hand.
Read next
Give us one night.
Send us one evening's orders. We run the night next to you. In the morning you compare the two.